Manuscript under revision. On December 20, I submitted the revised article.

Manuscript under revision. I'm second author and submission is at a high impact journal. My question What’s the best way to list this in my CV? Jan 24, 2021 · I submitted my article to an Elsevier journal on August 5, 2020. Can I cite a submitted manuscript as "under review" in another manuscript? What's the correct procedure for citing under review works? Dear Devnath Shah your original question " After submitting major revision, my paper went for review, after that status again changed to "Under Review". Nov 21, 2020 · To respond to your queries until then, it’s a bit unusual that the revised manuscript (for a minor revision decision) has gone to Under Review, which mostly means that the peer reviewer/s need/s to look at your changes. Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. Does anyone use 'under revision'? It is likely the case that by the time I finish the piece in which I cite myself, the situation will be clearer. Preprint archives do not compromise novelty. This means that authors will have to start again and submit their manuscripts to a different journal. Oct 1, 2016 · Even revised papers may get rejected, so being in revision is no guarantee to get the paper published. A manuscript under consideration can be, for instance, desk-rejected by a journal editor. However, I am unsure on how to cite the first manuscript in the second. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. I also would not state the journal to which the paper is submitted to because I do not see how this says anything about the quality of the paper. On my primary app and all previous secondaries, I simply listed this paper as "Manuscript Under Review". Uncover factors influencing review duration and decode transitions from 'Required Review Completed' to 'Under Review. But only include those where there's actually a reasonably mature manuscript / already submitted as you may be asked about them. Feb 16, 2019 · Yesterday my lab heard back regarding a paper, with positive reviews and editor asking for some revisions. At your early stage an extra paper or 2 on the list makes a big difference. Is it generally okay to include manuscripts "in preparation" or "in revision" on my CV? Context is that I am wrapping up PhD applications and am making sure my CV is as up to date as it possibly can be. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I Oct 25, 2019 · In the second manuscript, I have used one of the models developed in the first manuscript and have carried out an elaborate study. Aug 25, 2021 · I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. On December 20, I submitted the revised article. The status changed to Under Review on August 30. that are repeated every time a revised manuscript is submitted. I spoke with Elsevier’s journal Aug 22, 2016 · But 'In prep' seems to not do it justice, as it has been accepted. Oct 13, 2024 · Mastering the art of journal manuscript revision is key to navigating the path to publication. By understanding the peer review process, effectively analyzing feedback, and implementing strategic revisions, you can significantly enhance your manuscript’s quality and increase its chances of acceptance. For instance, should I add them in my CV as under-review papers and mention the conferences to which I submitted? Then, should I also include the pre-prints in my postdoc applications? Also, these conferences have double-blind review processes. Just put it in a seperate section after your publications under "manuscripts in preparation" or similar. ‘Revision’ here could mean that your manuscript requires further revisions to be accepted. Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. Oct 6, 2020 · When you submit a research manuscript for peer review, the journal may report the status of the review as “in review” or “under review”. Sep 3, 2025 · Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. From a purely grammatical perspective there’s not much difference between the two terms. If a reviewer has recommended revisions, authors will then need to re-submit their manuscript having made appropriate changes. On December 5, I received a minor revision decision from one reviewer and a major revision decision from the other. It may be that one journal uses the term “in review” and another the term “under review”, both to signify the same thing: that your academic paper is In reality, this ‘road’ or manuscript publication process is not as linear as illustrated in the figure above. However, I do not know how to present my under-review works. Sep 13, 2017 · Based on other questions on the site it seems that listing a paper under revision in the CV is not always appropriate, but that as a student in my situation it should be okay. Most papers undergo revisions before acceptance. Finishing the revisions before the application deadlines is unfortunately not an option. But for this point in time (and for ongoing conference presentations) it would be good to know what the style is here. Papers that are published independently while your manuscript is under review or under revision at Nature Communications are also not Jun 13, 2018 · Journals usually have standard status changes like 'Under editorial processing,' 'Under review,' 'Decision pending,' 'Decision in process,' etc. '. I'm STEM in UK for reference Dive into the dynamics of manuscript status changes in peer review. If minor changes were requested, these are typically assessed by the editor. On December 22, the status changed to Under Review, and has remained so since then. 1c3oya5l zw0t vy lscc7 l0f4ijg uertu sknkb khs35 f5s7 ikg